
Zed
The high-performance, open-source editor built in Rust, with collaborative AI and multiplayer editing
Scorecard
overall 8.4/10The good
- 01The fastest editor on this list by a wide margin: Rust-native, GPU-accelerated, sub-frame keystroke latency
- 02Fully open source (community edition) with active development
- 03Real-time collaborative editing and multiplayer sessions built in from day one
- 04Runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows, with full DirectX 11 and WSL support on Windows
- 05Free tier gives you a complete editor; hosted AI is optional and usage-metered
- 06Zeta2, their open-weight language model, powers edit predictions
The not-so-good
- 01Extension ecosystem is growing but still much smaller than VS Code's
- 02AI features are solid but not as deep as Cursor's Composer or Claude Code's reasoning
- 03Some language server integrations are less mature than in established IDEs
- 04Multiplayer adoption depends on your team also using Zed
- →Developers who care deeply about editor performance and input latency
- →Remote pair-programming teams who want native multiplayer
- →Anyone frustrated with Electron-based editors and their resource overhead
- →Developers who want a free, open-source editor and will bring their own AI keys
- →Teams that need enterprise-grade AI privacy controls today
- →Heavy users of niche or legacy VS Code extensions
- →Developers who want the AI to drive the workflow rather than assist it
Our take
Zed is the editor for people who notice latency. Built by the team behind Atom and Tree-sitter, it's written entirely in Rust with GPU-accelerated rendering, and the difference is visceral. Scrolling through a 10,000-line file feels like a native macOS app, not a web browser pretending to be one. With full Windows support (DirectX 11, WSL integration) shipping alongside macOS and Linux, the platform coverage gap that held Zed back in its early days is gone.
The AI layer is capable but deliberately not the center of gravity. Zed's assistant panel supports a wide range of providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Ollama, OpenRouter, and more), and their in-house Zeta2 model handles edit predictions. It works well for inline help and conversational coding. What it won't do is match Cursor's multi-agent orchestration or Claude Code's sustained reasoning on complex refactors, and that's a conscious design choice, not an oversight.
Where Zed stands alone is multiplayer. Built-in real-time collaborative editing means you can pair-program with a teammate in the same buffer, with cursors and selections visible live. No plugin required, no latency penalty. If your team does regular pairing or mob programming, nothing else on this list comes close.
The value proposition is unusually clean, though not quite as free once you lean on hosted AI: the editor is free, open source, and complete without AI. If you want Zed-hosted models, Pro is $10/month with $5 of included token credit and usage-based billing beyond that. Verified university students can get the equivalent plan free for a year, with $10/month in included credit. If you'd rather bring your own API keys, you pay nothing. For developers who want a fast, modern editor and treat AI as a useful addition rather than the main event, Zed is one of the strongest options available.
Alternatives to Zed
See all →Claude Code
Anthropic's coding agent across terminal, IDE, desktop, web, and automation

Cursor
The AI-first code editor that replaced VS Code for a generation of developers
GitHub Copilot
The original AI pair programmer, now with agents, multi-model support, and a coding agent that files its own PRs
OpenAI Codex
OpenAI's cloud-native coding agent. Fire off tasks, get back pull requests
Windsurf
The agentic IDE, now backed by Cognition AI and Devin's autonomous engine